Iran’s toman crisis is no longer merely a fluctuation in the foreign exchange market; it has become a mirror reflecting the scale of the pressures facing the Iranian economy. The depreciation of the local currency is now linked to a combination of interconnected factors, most notably sanctions, military tensions, disruptions to maritime shipping, declining oil exports, and high inflation. The problem is that weakness in the toman does not remain confined to the currency market; it quickly spreads to prices, production, and citizens’ purchasing power.
Oil is one of Iran’s most important sources of foreign currency. According to July data, oil exports fell from about 1.7 million barrels per day in June to approximately 967,000 barrels per day in July. This decline means more than a loss of oil revenue; it also reduces the inflow of foreign currency that the economy needs to finance imports and support economic activity. With sanctions, difficulties in financial transfers, discounts offered to buyers, and rising transportation risks, Iran’s ability to convert its oil wealth into usable revenue becomes increasingly complicated.
This is where the most dangerous cycle emerges: declining exports reduce external revenues, shortages of foreign currency increase pressure on the toman, and a weaker toman raises the cost of imports and production. These higher costs are then passed on through rising prices, with ordinary citizens ultimately bearing the consequences.
The seriousness of this equation becomes particularly clear when it reaches food and essential goods. Families can postpone the purchase of many products, but they cannot postpone their daily necessities. When prices rise faster than wages, real income declines even if nominal salaries remain unchanged or increase slightly. In this way, the toman crisis shifts from a monetary issue into a cost-of-living crisis that directly affects the middle class and low-income households.
But the currency crisis has another equally serious dimension: confidence. When citizens or investors expect the toman to continue losing value, the desire to protect savings through dollars, gold, or real estate increases. As demand for alternative assets rises, pressure on the local currency intensifies, turning negative expectations themselves into a factor that fuels the crisis.
Over the longer term, the impact extends to investment. Currency volatility makes it difficult for businesses to estimate the costs of projects, equipment, and raw materials, prompting some companies to postpone or reduce investment. Lower investment today means weaker productivity, fewer job opportunities, and slower economic growth in the future.
Can the toman regain stability?
The answer does not depend on intervention in the foreign exchange market alone. Currency stability requires strengthening the economy’s ability to generate foreign currency, maintaining more stable oil exports, controlling inflation, improving the investment and production environment, and easing trade and financial restrictions.
The real question, therefore, is not how far the toman may fall against the dollar, but how effectively the Iranian economy can restore confidence and halt the erosion of purchasing power.
If sanctions, tensions, declining revenues, and high inflation persist, the toman will remain a reflection of broader economic exhaustion. If, however, external de-escalation is accompanied by domestic economic reform and increased investment and production, the currency may regain some degree of stability.
Ultimately, the future of the toman will not be determined by the foreign exchange market alone, but by Iran’s ability to transform its oil wealth into production, investment, confidence, and sustainable economic growth.
Economic Unit – North America Office
Al-Rawabit Center for Research and Strategic Studies
