About the Dimensions of Ahmet Davutoglu’s visit to Tehran

About the Dimensions of Ahmet Davutoglu’s visit to Tehran

- in Releases
1270
Comments Off on About the Dimensions of Ahmet Davutoglu’s visit to Tehran

اوغلو-تركيا-إيران-768x506

In a move that was not announced in advance, the Turkish Prime Minister Ahmed Davutoglu visited on the fourth of this month, the Iranian capital Tehran and he has met during his visit with a number of officials in the Iranian regime, headed by President of the Republic Hassan Rowhani. This visit is the first of its kind for Ahmet Davutoglu since assuming the presidency of the Turkish government in the twenty first of August  2014 .

The visit comes at a time when the Turkish-Iranian relations is witnessing a clash in many regional issues, which extends from the Middle East “Iraq, Syria, Yemen” to the Caucasus countries. However this clash did not prevent to pay the visit, noting that   the two countries , “Iran and Turkey,”  emerging middle powers in the international system, are proceeded from a political realism in the conduct of and understand their  relations and mutual interests, and in keeping with this understanding ,  the visit  of Turkish Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu to Tehran  was made.

This unannounced visit , and in these confused regional environment, has its dimensions,  and the first ones  of these dimensions is : the security dimension which is directly linked to the repercussions of the Syrian crisis and its negative effects on both Iran and Turkey alike. Prior to start  the truce in the twenty-seventh in  the last February , between Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and the armed opposition, the US Secretary of State John Kerry has said that in the absence of the cessation of hostilities in Syria, it is difficult to prevent the division of Syria, and  far-going days of the truce , Vice Russian Foreign Minister, Sergei Ryabkov, said Moscow hopes that the participants in the Syrian negotiations to come to the idea of ​​establishing a federal republic, and considered that the Syrians must put specific criteria for political restructuring in Syria , the future , that it depends on maintaining the territorial integrity of the country, including the possibility of establishing a federal republic  .

There is no doubt  that these statements are raising the concern  both Turkey and Iran, noting that the  idea of ​​the US  ,division or the Russian Federal mean  to the political decision-maker in Turkey about the probability of the existence of another Kurdish region in the future  , a nearby  to the Turkish border, similar to  the Kurdish region in northern Iraq, and this is not accepted by the  Turkish government, they are afraid that the matter will be  pulled up  on the Kurds in Turkey and encourage them to claim the autonomy at the very least- or break away to establish the State of North Kurdistan, especially if we know that of Kurds in Turkey, representing 15% of the people, and the Kurds  are representing   the majority in the 15 Turkish provinces out of 81.

This partition or federalism that if it has become a reality and recognized,   their  negative impacts will not be confined to Turkey alone, but also will be pulled up to the Republic of Iran, as an infection  of the autonomy or secession from it  might hit it ,  what encourage Kurds in Iran  for this is  the number of them in Iran which, according to  the latest estimates,   approximately 7% of the total  of Iran’s population ,  nearly 66 million people ,  are Kurds, where their number  are estimated by four million and  six hundred and twenty thousand. Most Kurds live in Kurdistan province, and the province of Kermanshah and Ilam Province and Western Azerbaijan as  these provinces are called  according to Kurdish culture by eastern Kurdistan.

This visit comes in the context of an Iranian – Turkish  joint  coordination of their  rejection  positions  to redraw the Middle East map by the new drawers of the region, the United States and the Russian Federation, this new drawing to the map  of the region will not be easily implemented as happened a hundred years ago and during the First World War by Britain and France, as long as there are regional countries where their  interests will be harmed in general, and  Iran and Turkey in particular .it is worth noting that the current  Regional and international  circumstances  are not similar entirely with that circumstances that prevailed after World War I which resulted to the   disintegration of the countries such as the disintegration of Ottoman Empire  , in order to get to the same regional and international  conclusions.

The economic dimension is the second goal of the visit, as it is linked to the lifting of international sanctions last January for the Republic of Iran, and it is  clearly evident  from the ministers who accompanied Ahmed Davutoglu to Tehran , and they  are: economy minister, Mustafa Alitah, and the minister of energy and  Natural Resources, Pratt Olbarac, and the Minister of customs and trade, Bulent Tovnkja, and the Minister of development Cevdet Yilmaz, Minister of transport and communications and maritime navigation, Ben Ali Yildirim. The Turkish government, which sided with Iran during the economic sanctions and benefited greatly from trade with it ,  so  Turkey wants to   promote the economic cooperation with Iran at some stage after the lifting of international sanctions against it, especially in the aspect of trade exchange  in the of ​​Turkey’s import of Iranian power, both ” oil and gas, “and also as a conduit for Iranian energy to world markets. Turkey is seeking through this economic cooperation with Iran to reduce the damage to the Turkish economy due to the repercussions of the Arab Spring and the sanctions imposed by Russia on the back ground of Turkish drop of Russian fighter jet in November last year.

The third dimension of the visit is embodied  in the diplomatic dimension, as the convergence in Iranian-Turkish relations will allow , despite a sharp contradiction in resolving the Syrian crisis, the practice of the government of justice and development  for the role that  was characterized by a mediating role in the solution of disputes between states , especially the current dispute between the  Saudi Arabia and the Republic of Iran,  Turkey is in a position to contribute to the convergence of views between the two countries, especially the Great  powers like the United States of America and the major  as Federal Russia  are to invest this dispute in order to serve their interests, according to the colonial principle  “divide and rule”, and  not concerned  to the interests of regional allies and many evidences for this  , so the regional security for this part of the Middle East lies with these countries, “Turkey, Iran and Saudi Arabia,” to get to the security situation that the matter requires reaching a diplomatic settlement to end the conflict situation among them, , and perhaps the statement of Iranian President Hassan Rohani about the contacts  and heading of an Iranian political delegation to visit Riyadh, is a step in the right direction. The question  to be raised   will these countries  be remained a patch on the stones of the chess of  great and major  powers  alike .

 

Rawabet Center for  Research and Strategic Studies