Brussels bombings: the face of terrorism in Europe

Brussels bombings: the face of terrorism in Europe

- in Releases
938
Comments Off on Brussels bombings: the face of terrorism in Europe

بروكسل-تفجيرات

The Belgian capital (Brussels)  witnessed  on Tuesday morning, March 22, 2016 a series of terrorist attacks that killed more than 34 people dead and 135 injured and hit the airport (Zafineetm) and the metro station (malbec), to confirm the fact that  has become well established and realistic that terrorism is not limited by region or country, but includes all the countries of the world and the terrorists policy is  the extension  and moving forward  and spread terror and fear in all areas and regions of the world and  seek to kill many people and making  of  material  and human  losses anywhere in reach of the hands of terrorism, and this is already  indicated by the Rawabet Center for research and Strategic Studies  ,  on November 201,515 in its  article  (terrorism in Paris , its prospects and its extensions).
We  are  living  now  a moment  of the real confrontation with terrorism tools and the pursuit of its elements and its leaders to prove their existence and harness all their potential to achieve their goals and seek to promote and boost the morale of their cadres belonging to them and falling within sleeper cells and extending across places where they can reach it, and  European  depth   has become a major target and very urgent need  to direct  the terrorist strikes  to all the bases and  important  strategic sites t in European capitals and seeking actively to confuse the security situation and transplant cases of fear and panic among the citizens of these countries , in addition to foil the plans and capabilities of intelligence that the the security forces in European capitals are seeking to limit the activity and movement and the extension of international terrorism.
the announcement of the adoption of state organization of a series of operations and attacks  in the capital (Brussels)  and confirmed by the agency (Amaq ) of the media center linked  with the organization using the containers and explosive belts which preceded the shooting of several gun shots in the places of event  and immersion (3) of the elements of the organization and blow themselves up during the implementation of the attacks.
the incident of terrorism occurred in the country located in the north – central Europe , a  neutral country and is considered a small country in terms of the size of  area and the  number of the population and shares a border with  each of  (Germany, France, Luxembourg and the Netherlands) and has a private  regulations that help to facilitate the residence and acceptance of immigrants and treat them humanly , and the  presence of the headquarters of (NATO) and the headquarters of the ( High Commissioner  of the European union) in its capital has given to  this country political importance   and  international consideration  to be spoken about it by others and  the concerned of world affairs  .
these indicators make us  to realize the importance of the goals  that the  terrorism  is seeking  to reach  and identifying  tracks of its operations in places that   the objectives of it  are well chosen  which are thoughtful and concrete with the timings that reflect the experience and  awareness  in the terrorist field work.
In a realistic outlook to  what happened , we  can  identify the following observations:
1. The  terrorist act  was taken place after  four days of  the success of the Belgian security   to  the arrest  (Salah Abdel – Salam) , the  suspect and the major one who is  in charge  of  Paris bombings that took place in November 13, 2015.
2. this work   indicates to  the  clear security failure   of  the  Belgian  security services  to be lacking  of   pursuit  and to extrapolate  the future of the terrorist act in  and trends of terrorist organizations and find out sleeper cells and the weakness of the security precautions that should be taken into account after the arrest of the most important participants of the incident of terrorism in the French capital (Paris).
3.   The ignorance of  European countries and the intelligence  and  security services to the  risk posed by existing terrorist cells on its soil and poor security coordination and mutual   between these countries and its  security institutions.
4.  It was used  in this terrorist act , a number of devices and explosive belts ,  we have to wonder how  Alangmasyun were managed  to deliver  these  materials  into the corridors and halls of the airport and how they were able to skip checkpoints and the Belgian security men  ??
5. The  events have come  to indicate the fact that the goals of the organization of the state and his quest to use and invest the media side  to its  works and choose places of  bombing so as to achieve a  media resonance  that seek it.
6. the incident  led  the Interior Minister of Belgium (that Gambon) to declare  for evacuation of nuclear Rathaj reactor near the border with Germany and the announcement of the closure of the airport in which the terrorist incident  was occurred and suspended all flights and to declare a state of emergency in the country.
the consequences of the incident and the results of the European Union ( EU )measures can be monitored by the following:
1.To accelerate the efforts to defeat state regulation and foil its plans and ongoing joint cooperation with the security services in Belgium and to stop the advance of its fighters and to address them.
2.To enhance the  protections and deployment of military and security forces and intensify their duties at the common border points and in the important strategic places.
3. To work  seriously and effectively to accelerate the weakening the strength   and effectiveness of   the state regulation and the intensification of the European contribution pledged by EU countries.
4.To dry up  the springs and sources of financial and armament funding for the organization and thwart its  plans and deprive it  of the ability to recruit people and bring in new elements and sustain the momentum of confrontation and initiate  fighting , targeting and reducing its activities.
5. the presence of elements of the organization and their leaders in the Libyan coastal cities and their quest to control it threatens the  regional and international security  , including European interests in the Middle East region and constitutes a direct threat to the national security of these countries.
6.  To  target the  depth  of EU by state regulation  by offensive operations   and the impact on the security situation of the capitals of the EU through the presence of terrorism and its tools in Libya and its extensions  on Tunisian territory.
7. Employment  all possibilities and relations which linked among the EU countries to each other in the military field to face state regulation fighters and strengthen joint efforts to inflict the biggest losses on  the organization and its fighters.
8. To set   key controls for the movement and the displacement of many Arabs and Muslims refugees and   establish inspections and follow – up points on the border linking Belgium and its neighbors of the European countries in an attempt to limit the movement of terrorists and their infiltration taking advantage of the movement and the displacement of the refugees at the present time.
State organization  adopted the style and the principle ( of surprise and shock) , a technique that is used in all operations  of the strategic dimension  in the face of the enemies of the organization, will we see in the coming days to continue with this approach , or will  be   of the international and European effort  another talk  to stop the stretch and creep of the  organization by the activity of the military and security effort to combat international terrorism ??

 

Rawabet Center for  Research and Strategic Studies